Accessibility Statement
WCAGHub is a platform for measuring digital accessibility, so we hold our own product to the same standards we ask our customers to meet. This Statement tells you exactly how conformant WCAGHub is with WCAG 2.2, what's been tested, what's known to be imperfect, and how to tell us when something doesn't work for you.
Partially conformant with WCAG 2.2 Level AA
- Target standard
- WCAG 2.2 AA Plus select AAA
- Level A
- 100% 30 / 30 criteria
- Level AA
- 98% 24 / 24 + minor gap
- Level AAA
- 38% Where sensible, not committed
- Audited by
- Internal + tooling Annual 3rd-party planned
- Known defects
- 3 open All tracked, see §5
Our commitment
Accessibility isn't a feature we added — it's the reason WCAGHub exists. WCAGHub Pty Ltd (ABN [TBD], "we", "us") is committed to ensuring that everyone — regardless of disability, age or assistive technology — can use our platform to check, improve and monitor the accessibility of their own digital content.
We measure our product against WCAG 2.2 Level AA and aim for Level AAA where it is sensible and does not compromise clarity. We design and test with real assistive technology (screen readers, switch devices, magnifiers, voice control), not just automated tooling.
We believe accessibility is continuous: this Statement is updated at least every 6 months, open issues are tracked publicly in §5, and we welcome every report — even small ones.
Scope of this Statement
This Statement covers:
- The public website at wcaghub.com and all subpages served from that domain.
- The customer dashboard at app.wcaghub.com, including account settings, billing, and scan-history views.
- The three checker apps: Web Accessibility Checker, PDF Accessibility Checker and Document Accessibility Checker, including their report views and interactive fix guides.
- PDF and DOCX reports exported from WCAGHub, which are produced as tagged, structured, accessible documents.
The Statement does not cover:
- Third-party websites linked from our platform.
- Our customers' own content scanned through WCAGHub — we report its accessibility but we do not control it.
- Third-party tools integrated into our workflows (e.g. the Stripe checkout page), which are governed by the vendors' own accessibility statements.
Conformance with WCAG 2.2
WCAGHub aims for WCAG 2.2 Level AA conformance across the entire platform. The current status is partially conformant — i.e. most content meets the standard, but some parts do not yet fully conform. Open gaps are listed in §5.
| Principle | What it covers | Level A | Level AA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Perceivable | Alt text, captions, contrast, resize, orientation | Full | Full |
| 2. Operable | Keyboard, timing, seizure-safety, target size, focus order | Full | Partial |
| 3. Understandable | Language, consistency, error identification, help | Full | Full |
| 4. Robust | Parsing, ARIA name/role/value, status messages | Full | Full |
WCAG 2.2 added nine new success criteria on top of 2.1. Our position on each:
| SC | Criterion | Level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4.11 | Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) | AA | Full |
| 2.4.12 | Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) | AAA | Full |
| 2.4.13 | Focus Appearance | AAA | Full |
| 2.5.7 | Dragging Movements | AA | Full |
| 2.5.8 | Target Size (Minimum) — 24×24 CSS px | AA | Partial |
| 3.2.6 | Consistent Help | A | Full |
| 3.3.7 | Redundant Entry | A | Full |
| 3.3.8 | Accessible Authentication (Minimum) | AA | Full |
| 3.3.9 | Accessible Authentication (Enhanced) | AAA | Full |
What we've deliberately built for accessibility
Rather than list only the absence of barriers, here's the affirmative work — features built specifically so people with disabilities can use WCAGHub independently.
100% keyboard-operable
Every control, filter, modal and interactive report view can be reached and operated using only a keyboard. A visible skip link at the top of each page jumps to main content. All custom components (tab order overlay, markers, filters, preview navigator) support standard ARIA patterns.
Tested with NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver
Scan reports, dashboards and checkout flows are tested monthly with current versions of NVDA (Windows/Chrome & Firefox), JAWS (Windows/Chrome) and VoiceOver (macOS/Safari & iOS). Live-region announcements are used for scan progress, result updates and filter changes.
Minimum 4.5:1, often 7:1
Body text clears 4.5:1 contrast throughout, and most large text and UI components clear the AAA 7:1 threshold. A built-in high-contrast mode is triggered by the prefers-contrast: more media query and can be toggled manually in Settings → Accessibility.
Respects reduced-motion
Animations, auto-scrolling, progress pulses and transitions are suppressed when the user's system reports prefers-reduced-motion: reduce. No animation exceeds 5 seconds and none flashes more than 3 times per second (passes 2.3.1).
44×44 px minimum
Primary touch targets are at least 44×44 CSS pixels — comfortably above WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.8 Minimum (24×24 px). A small number of inline-text icon buttons are known exceptions; see §5.
Focus is never obscured
We pass WCAG 2.2 SC 2.4.11 and 2.4.12. The focus indicator is a 3 px blue outline offset by 2 px, exceeding SC 2.4.13 Focus Appearance. Sticky headers scroll focus into view automatically.
Accessible PDF & DOCX exports
Every report exported from WCAGHub is a tagged, structured document with language, title, logical reading order, accessible tables and alternative text — validated against PDF/UA ISO 14289 and DOCX accessibility rules.
Clear, plain language
UI copy is written at around Flesch grade 8. Error messages are specific ("Invalid email address — missing the ‘@'"), and we avoid jargon and idioms in all critical flows.
No cognitive-function login puzzles
Passkeys, magic links and OAuth are offered as primary sign-in methods. No CAPTCHA or cognitive test is required to sign in — passing WCAG 2.2 SC 3.3.8 and SC 3.3.9.
Known issues & exceptions
We publish open gaps against our own target. We update this section whenever an issue is introduced, planned, or resolved. If you find something else, please report it (§10).
- A11Y-OPEN-01 · Interactive "marker tooltip" close icon is 20×20 px On the Web Checker report, the small (x) button that dismisses a marker tooltip is 20×20 CSS px. This falls below WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.8 Minimum (24×24). A keyboard equivalent (Esc) and a larger "Close" button in the panel footer are both available — so SC 2.5.8 Exception 1 applies — but we will enlarge the icon in the next UI sprint regardless. Opened 2026-02-10 · Status: fix scheduled 2026-05
- A11Y-OPEN-02 · Colour contrast on muted timestamps in dashboard Muted timestamps ("3 days ago") currently hit 4.3:1 contrast against white — just below the 4.5:1 Level AA threshold for body text. Fix queued: deepen the muted colour by one step. Opened 2026-03-02 · Status: fix scheduled 2026-05
- A11Y-OPEN-03 · Legacy pricing table on blog posts older than 2025-12 A small number of older blog posts still use a pre-2024 pricing table without proper <th scope> attributes. The table is read by screen readers but column relationships are not announced. Opened 2025-12-08 · Status: content rewrite in progress
Content produced by WCAGHub (e.g. images uploaded by users to their customer dashboard) falls outside our authoring control. Where an accessibility issue originates in customer-contributed content, we will still work with you to ensure an accessible alternative is available under §6.
Accessible alternatives
If any part of WCAGHub is inaccessible to you in its current form, we provide free accessible alternatives — this is a firm commitment, not a favour.
- Reports by email. We can deliver any scan report as a plain-text email, an accessible tagged PDF, a Word document or a structured CSV — whichever works best for you.
- Human walk-through. Our support team can walk you through any report or dashboard over the phone or video call, in English, and will describe visual elements aloud on request.
- Manual scan submission. If the scan-setup dashboard is unusable for you, email a URL or upload a file via encrypted transfer to info@wcaghub.com and we will run the scan for you and return the results in your preferred format.
- API alternative. Developers using assistive tech can bypass the UI entirely via our REST API, which is documented in a fully accessible way.
- Reasonable adjustments. If none of the above fits, we commit to a bespoke adjustment at no cost. Write to info@wcaghub.com describing what you need.
Testing methodology
The platform is tested using a combination of automated, manual, and lived-experience approaches. None of these substitutes for the others — automated tooling can only catch a subset of WCAG failures.
Automated tooling
- axe-core rules run in CI on every pull request that changes front-end code.
- WCAGHub's own Web Checker is run against every deploy as a dogfood exercise.
- Lighthouse a11y audit runs nightly against our marketing site and customer dashboard.
- Pa11y CI acts as a second automated opinion on release branches.
- VeraPDF validates every exported PDF for PDF/UA conformance.
Manual testing
- Keyboard-only walk-through of every critical flow (sign-up, checkout, scan, report, cancel) on each release.
- Screen-reader testing with NVDA (Windows + Chrome/Firefox), JAWS (Windows + Chrome) and VoiceOver (macOS + Safari, iOS + Safari) at least monthly.
- Zoom + reflow test at 400% zoom, 320 CSS-pixel viewport width.
- High-contrast and forced-colors mode on Windows and macOS.
- Voice-control test using Dragon NaturallySpeaking and macOS Voice Control.
- Switch-device test using iOS Switch Control and macOS Switch Control.
User testing
We regularly engage disabled users and accessibility consultants for scheduled feedback rounds — not just as testers, but as collaborators on design. The goal is to ship nothing without someone relying on assistive tech having touched it.
Third-party audit
An annual independent WCAG 2.2 audit by a certified external accessibility consultancy is scheduled for Q3 2026. The audit report will be summarised here and the full findings made available to customers under NDA.
Assistive-technology compatibility
WCAGHub is actively tested with the following assistive-tech combinations. Other combinations likely work too, but these are the ones we sign off on each release.
| Assistive tech | Browser / OS | Status | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA 2024.x | Chrome & Firefox / Windows 11 | Supported | April 2026 |
| JAWS 2024 | Chrome / Windows 11 | Supported | April 2026 |
| VoiceOver | Safari / macOS 14 Sonoma+ | Supported | April 2026 |
| VoiceOver iOS | Safari / iOS 17+ | Supported | March 2026 |
| TalkBack | Chrome / Android 14+ | Best effort | February 2026 |
| Dragon NaturallySpeaking | Chrome / Windows 11 | Supported | March 2026 |
| macOS Voice Control | Safari / macOS 14 | Supported | March 2026 |
| Windows Magnifier + ZoomText | Edge / Windows 11 | Supported | February 2026 |
| Switch Control | Safari / iOS 17+ | Supported | February 2026 |
Regional alignment
We align our conformance target with the major national and regional accessibility regimes so that the same audit satisfies multiple obligations.
European Accessibility Act (EAA)
Aligned with Directive (EU) 2019/882 and the harmonised standard EN 301 549 v3.2.1 (which incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA and a superset of requirements). WCAGHub meets the higher WCAG 2.2 AA bar.
Web Accessibility Directive
Public-sector bodies in the EU follow Directive (EU) 2016/2102, also referencing EN 301 549. This Statement follows the model required by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1523.
Equality Act 2010 + PSBAR 2018
Addresses the duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 and, for public-sector bodies, the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Apps) Accessibility Regulations 2018.
ADA + Section 508
ADA Title III has no codified technical standard, but WCAG AA is treated as the de-facto benchmark by US courts. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Revised 2017 references WCAG 2.0 AA; we meet the newer 2.2 AA.
DDA 1992 + Digital Service Standard
Addresses the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and the Australian Digital Service Standard, which mandates WCAG 2.1 AA for government digital services.
AODA + ACA
Meets AODA (Ontario) WCAG 2.0 AA requirement and is aligned with the federal Accessible Canada Act (2019) and its Accessibility Standards (ASC).
LBI + e-MAG
Aligned with the Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Law 13.146/2015) and the Brazilian e-MAG guidelines for government services.
NZ Web Accessibility Standard
Aligned with the New Zealand Web Accessibility Standard 1.1 which mandates WCAG 2.1 AA for government websites.
ISO 14289 (PDF/UA)
Every PDF exported from WCAGHub is validated against ISO 14289-1:2014 (PDF/UA-1) and the Matterhorn Protocol using VeraPDF.
How to report an accessibility problem
If WCAGHub is not accessible to you in any way, please tell us. We treat accessibility reports as P1 issues and respond faster than standard support.
-
Send us the details.
Email info@wcaghub.com, or use the in-app "Report accessibility problem" link in any footer. Please tell us: the page URL or screen, what you tried to do, the assistive technology you were using, and what went wrong.
-
Acknowledgement within 2 business days.
You'll get a reply from a named person with a reference number and our initial assessment of severity.
-
Resolution target: 10 business days.
For critical barriers we aim to ship a fix within 10 business days. For complex issues we agree a longer timeline with you and give you a workaround or an accessible alternative (§6) in the meantime.
-
Verification with you.
Once fixed, we don't just close the ticket — we ask you to confirm the fix works for you in your own environment.
-
Published in §5.
Any material issue that cannot be fixed immediately is added to the "Known issues" list (§5) so other users know we're aware and working on it.
You never pay to get accessibility support. Alternative formats of reports, a human walk-through, a manual scan-run and any other reasonable adjustment are all provided free of charge.
Enforcement & complaint pathways
If you are not satisfied with our response to an accessibility complaint, you can escalate through a regulator or equality body in your country. Our goal is to resolve issues before that is necessary, but your right to complain is not limited by anything in this Statement.
- European Union. Each EU Member State has a national enforcement body under the Web Accessibility Directive and the EAA. Contact details are collected on the European Commission's accessibility portal.
- United Kingdom. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) enforces the Equality Act 2010; public-sector website complaints go to the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).
- United States. Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice for ADA complaints; the Access Board oversees Section 508.
- Australia. Complaints under the DDA go to the Australian Human Rights Commission.
- Canada. Canadian Human Rights Commission (federal) and provincial commissions under AODA, Code Québec, etc.
- Brazil. Ministério Público and Defensoria Pública under the LBI.
Changes to this Statement
This Statement is reviewed and republished at least every 6 months, and immediately whenever a material change to the platform affects conformance. Previous versions are preserved at /legal/accessibility-statement/history/ so you can see how our position has evolved.
This version (3.1) was prepared on 19 April 2026 and takes effect on the same date. Next scheduled review: 19 October 2026.
Contact
Registered office
WCAGHub Pty Ltd
ABN [TBD]
[REGISTERED ADDRESS]
Australia
This Accessibility Statement is published in English. If you need it in a different language or format, contact info@wcaghub.com and we will provide one at no cost.